Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]
Date: 2011-01-26 18:45:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 15:48, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 13:04, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:52 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote:
>>>> You mean packing both a string representation and a reference to a single SV * value?
>>> Dunno, I'm not a guts guy.
>> Well, neither me (I haven't used much of the guts api there).
> Find attached a proof of concept that modifies Alexey's patch to do
> the above (using the overload example I and others posted).
[ ... ]
> Thoughts?  Should I polish this a bit more?  Or do we like the GUC better?

So its been over a week with no comments. ISTM there were more people
against adding yet another GUC.  Barring objection ill finish the
missing parts of the POC patch I posted and submit that.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2011-01-26 18:47:56
Subject: Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
Previous:From: Richard BroersmaDate: 2011-01-26 18:32:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group