Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Trac tickets

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trac tickets
Date: 2010-12-31 14:59:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 15:53, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Yes, but it requires significant manual filtering *now* to produce it
>> as well.
> No, it requires 30 seconds per commit that is worthy of mention.
> Dropping the changelog will mean that work gets pushed to me (or
> Guillaume) to do immediately prior to release, in a way that could
> take a few hours to extract and format the data appropriately. At a
> time when we're usually pretty darn busy already.

Well, fair enough, i guess the answer is "yes" to the question "will
you veto this" :-)

BTW, if we're keeping it, it would certainly be good if there was a
useful policy for how to deal with it wrt back branches. Perhaps there
is one today and I just don't know it? Looking at it now it seems that
the head version has a mix of head and backbranches and backbranch
versions has nothing? ISTM that's pretty hard to parse - thus I'm not
even sure that's how it's meant to be now?

 Magnus Hagander

In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-12-31 15:03:33
Subject: Re: Trac tickets
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-12-31 14:53:38
Subject: Source reindenting - it is done

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group