Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

From: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Date: 2010-12-06 20:38:44
Message-ID: AANLkTi=9pfUtncJMOLSn+d0fEefAMP82YzFMzfUEh_FG@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ahh, catalog :-)
But PostgreSQL has a templates. If I understood you correctly,
the problem is to let the application works with same object names
of the objects in a different databases?

2010/12/6 Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org>

> What is "schema" in this context?
>>
>
> Oracle "schema" == Postgres "database": a collection of objects (tables,
> functions, triggers, views, etc) owned by a user.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
// Dmitriy.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Kerr 2010-12-06 20:39:23 Re: Problems Authenticating against OpenLDAP
Previous Message Michael C Rosenstein 2010-12-06 20:34:56 Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?