| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming a base backup from master |
| Date: | 2010-09-03 11:30:02 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=3trkwykc9-GOXGXYsGVqxaNYwue2F2nXhuNwO@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 13:25, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3 September 2010 12:19, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> TODO:
>>
>> * We need a smarter way to do pg_start/stop_backup() with this. At the
>> moment, you can only have one backup running at a time, but we shouldn't
>> have that limitation with this built-in mechanism.
>
> Would it be possible to not require pg_start/stop_backup() for this
> new feature? (yes, I'm probably missing something obvious here)
You don't need to run it *manually*, but the process needs to run it
automatically in the background for you. Which it does already in the
suggested patch.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-09-03 11:30:04 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-03 11:28:51 | Re: Streaming a base backup from master |