Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: Patch for phypot - Pygmy Hippotause

From: Andrew Geery <andrew(dot)geery(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, plm(at)netspace(dot)net(dot)au, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review: Patch for phypot - Pygmy Hippotause
Date: 2010-07-24 10:47:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
It looks good to me: (0) new patch applies cleanly to CVS HEAD; (1)
the formating of the code was changed; (2) definition of the HYPOT
macro was changed to use phypot rather than being removed; (3) the
phypot function was declared to be extern; (4) the comments to the
phypot function were changed to remove the reference about the SUS

I changed the status to "Ready for Committer".


On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think the patch is good in principle
> Since everyone seems to agree this is a good patch which needed
> minor tweaks, and we haven't heard from the author, I just went
> ahead and made the changes.
> Andrew, could you take another look and see if you agree I've
> covered it all before it gets marked ready for a committer?
> -Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Yeb HavingaDate: 2010-07-24 12:17:51
Subject: Re: Review of Synchronous Replication patches
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-07-24 10:21:23
Subject: Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group