Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_execute_from_file review

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Date: 2010-11-29 17:35:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I'd pick pg_execute_from_file() and just plain pg_execute(), myself.
> For the record there's only one name exposed at the SQL level. Or do you
> want me to expand the patch to actually include a pg_execute() version
> of the function, that would execute the query in PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)?

No, not particularly.

>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> What did you think of "pg_execute_sql_file"?
>> That, I like.
> Ok, I call pg_execute_sql_file() the winner and will prepare a new patch
> later tonight, now is comute time.

Sounds good.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-11-29 17:36:37
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-11-29 17:34:02
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group