Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: "'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date: 2004-04-30 03:27:15
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F423@harris.memetrics.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >  Win32 has continued on a steady pace for six months now.
> Be honest ... 6 months ago, did you believe the Win32 work would have
> taken >6 months?  How many of the current issues could you have
> anticipated?  How many will crop up in the next month?

FWIW, the backend porting effort started less than 5 months ago :-P

What "current issues" are there? The only ones of any significance that
popped up were the APC/socket interactions and the localtime deficiencies,
both of which now appear solved.

Perhaps I will regret saying this but from my point of view, apart from the
fsync/sync code Tom is working on that I am in complete ignorance of, I do
not imagine any new issues in the remaining items required to get win32 to


Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-04-30 03:31:36
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-04-30 03:10:15
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group