Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 regression test status

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Bruce Momjian' <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: 'Tom Lane ' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"''pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org' '" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status
Date: 2004-03-14 06:51:13
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F384@harris.memetrics.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
> Where are we on this?

I asked Tom about this privately a couple days ago, and he still isn't happy
about automatically adding ORDER BY.

FWIW, I've attached the changes I've made locally. Being a new guy on the
block, I'm going to stay out of this one from here on in, and will let you
guys duke it out as to whether or not it gets applied.


[Note: Is the ordering of null vs integer values variable by locale? If so,
the two last join changes may very well cause failure on some locales]

Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 

Attachment: rulejoin.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (11.7 KB)

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-03-14 13:57:45
Subject: listening addresses
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-14 05:37:03
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group