Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ERROR: relation . . . does not exist

From: "Albretch Mueller" <lbrtchx(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ERROR: relation . . . does not exist
Date: 2008-08-30 17:33:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
> spreadsheet programs (generally; I'm sure there are exceptions) don't have the notion of a schema; each cell can hold its own particular type.
 Oh, now I see what Martin meant!
> that's not a traditional part of a database engine.
 well, yeah! I would totally agree with you, but since I doubt very
much "COPY FROM CSV" is part of the SQL standard to beging with, why
not spice it up a little more?
> This is probably one of those classic "twenty lines of Perl" problems.
 java since 1.5 comes with a full blown, PERL-like regexp engine
> I suggest looking at:
> [1] A validator (regex) for each data type . . .
 that sort of things was what i was talking about, but I would go
quite a bit farther

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Albretch MuellerDate: 2008-08-30 17:36:25
Subject: Re: DUPS in tables columns ERROR: column ". . . " does not exist
Previous:From: Matthew DennisDate: 2008-08-30 17:27:32
Subject: Re: indexes on functions and create or replace function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group