|From:||Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>|
|To:||Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: Steps inside ExecEndGather)|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
The attached patch is revised one.
Invocation of Exec(Foreign|Custom)ParallelFinish was moved to
ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() not to walk on the plan-
state tree twice.
One (hypothetical) downside is, FDW/CSP can retrieve its own
run-time statistics only when query is executed under EXPLAIN
This enhancement allows FDW/CSP to collect its specific run-
time statistics more than Instrumentation, then show them as
output of EXPLAIN. My expected examples are GPU's kernel execution
time, DMA transfer ratio and so on. These statistics will never
appear in the Instrumentation structure, however, can be a hot-
point of performance bottleneck if CustomScan works on background
PG-Strom Project / NEC OSS Promotion Center
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Claudio Freire
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 3:37 PM
> To: Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平) <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
> Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>; Robert Haas
> <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>; pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: [HACKERS] Steps inside
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
> > I also had thought an idea to have extra space to Instrumentation
> > structure, however, it needs to make Instrumentation flexible-length
> > structure according to the custom format by CSP/FDW. Likely, it is not
> a good design.
> > As long as extension can retrieve its custom statistics on DSM area
> > required by ExecParallelEstimate(), I have no preference on the hook
> That's what I had in mind: the hook happens there, but the extension
> retrieves the information from some extension-specific DSM area, just as
> it would on the ParallelFinish hook.
> > One thing we may pay attention is, some extension (not mine) may want
> > to collect worker's statistics regardless of Instrumentation (in other
> > words, even if plan is not under EXPLAIN ANALYZE).
> > It is the reason why I didn't put a hook under the
> I don't think you should worry about that as long as it's a hypothetical
> If/when some extension actually needs to do that, the design can be discussed
> with a real use case at hand, and not a hypothetical one.
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org) To make
> changes to your subscription:
|Next Message||Amit Kapila||2017-02-17 07:25:01||Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes|
|Previous Message||Amit Langote||2017-02-17 06:47:29||Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT|