| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
| Date: | 2011-06-30 19:55:54 |
| Message-ID: | 99D3FD88-BE5D-4FA1-BD97-DBA0AEF24B13@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
> mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he didn't
> think that mentioning sponsors for patch development was a good idea.
>
> I don't think we have a policy for this, but I have done it for some
> time now and nobody has complained, so I sort of assumed it was okay.
> Besides, some of the people pouring the money in does care about it;
> moreover, it provides a little incentive for other companies that might
> also be in a position to fund development but lack the "peer approval"
> of the idea, or a final little push.
>
> So what's the general opinion here?
I certainly see no harm in it, and contributors at all levels -- including sponsors of new features or fixes -- ought to be acknowledged and thanked.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2011-06-30 20:00:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-30 19:09:02 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2011-06-30 20:00:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-30 19:09:02 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |