Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Date: 2011-06-30 19:55:54
Message-ID: 99D3FD88-BE5D-4FA1-BD97-DBA0AEF24B13@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
> mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he didn't
> think that mentioning sponsors for patch development was a good idea.
>
> I don't think we have a policy for this, but I have done it for some
> time now and nobody has complained, so I sort of assumed it was okay.
> Besides, some of the people pouring the money in does care about it;
> moreover, it provides a little incentive for other companies that might
> also be in a position to fund development but lack the "peer approval"
> of the idea, or a final little push.
>
> So what's the general opinion here?

I certainly see no harm in it, and contributors at all levels -- including sponsors of new features or fixes -- ought to be acknowledged and thanked.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2011-06-30 20:00:03 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-06-30 19:09:02 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2011-06-30 20:00:03 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-06-30 19:09:02 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID