Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT
Date: 2020-12-05 00:11:13
Message-ID: 999FEA52-ED7B-488D-9F2D-2F2DEF338CD9@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/4/20, 3:33 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Instead of adding checkpt_option_list, how about utility_option_list?
> It seems intended for reuse.

Ah, good call. That simplifies the grammar changes quite a bit.

Nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Add-SPREAD-option-to-CHECKPOINT.patch application/octet-stream 9.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhihong Yu 2020-12-05 01:09:06 Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-12-04 23:32:39 Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT