Re: [0.0] Re: [0.2] getting transactions to work

From: reiner peterke <zedaardv(at)drizzle(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-php(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rod K <rod(at)23net(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [0.0] Re: [0.2] getting transactions to work
Date: 2004-07-30 16:57:53
Message-ID: 9931C360-E249-11D8-8EE0-000A95984CA6@drizzle.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-php

i never said oracle did do that.
i don 't have so much experience working with databases and web pages
i do not have any understanding or misunderstanding. i am trying to
learn how it does work here. to my mind it should be able to work
within a web page. maybe you could be so kind as to explain to me why
it does not work.

r

On 30 jul 2004, at 18.32, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

>> i'm trying to test an idea. i know what i sent doesn't do much, but
>> i try out ideas before i go too far to make sure i understand what i
>> think i do
>> in my 'real life' i work with oracle. i like the idea of explicitly
>> telling the database when i'm done. i want to be able to trap errors
>> and rollback if necessary. also to give someone the choice of saving
>> the work or not. i know there are things i can do to create the
>> similar effect,
>> create the sql, then when i'm ready submit it to the database.
>
> Oracle doesn't do what you want either. I'm afraid you have a
> fundamental misunderstanding of how the HTTP process works.
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-php by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Dyson 2004-07-30 18:48:40 Re: [0.0] Re: [0.2] getting transactions to work
Previous Message bruce 2004-07-30 16:35:14 Re: [0.0] Re: [0.2] getting transactions to work