Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions

From: David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Luc Vlaming <luc(at)swarm64(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions
Date: 2023-01-30 09:13:37
Message-ID: 986821eb-ce4b-67c9-c203-f212a81e7c2f@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Dmitry,

On 1/27/23 16:18, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> As I've noted off-list, there was noticeable difference in the dumped
> bitcode, which I haven't noticed since we were talking mostly about
> differences between executions of the same query.
Thanks for the clarification and also thanks for helping with this effort.

--
David Geier
(ServiceNow)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ankit Kumar Pandey 2023-01-30 09:32:37 Re: Todo: Teach planner to evaluate multiple windows in the optimal order
Previous Message vignesh C 2023-01-30 09:12:43 Re: Deadlock between logrep apply worker and tablesync worker