From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |
Date: | 2009-09-30 19:45:29 |
Message-ID: | 9837222c0909301245v7cec1cds9afb403afb5d23d5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 21:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I can certainly review the win32 encoding patch, but I was rather
>> hoping for some comments from others on if we're interested in a win32
>> only solution, or if we want something more generic. Should we just go
>> with the win32-only one for now?
>
> That was actually the only substantive comment I had about it. I don't
> see why it's a win32-only problem or why a win32-only solution is a good
> approach.
Yeah, that's my thought as well.
If we want a complete one, we should reject this patch and ask for one
that does that.
If we are fine with a win32 only one, I can review this one and get it in.
I'm leaning towards us wanting a general one, but I'm unsure how much
work that will take.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-30 19:52:29 | Re: latest hstore patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-30 19:40:21 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |