| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> | 
| Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 | 
| Date: | 2009-07-23 09:01:28 | 
| Message-ID: | 9837222c0907230201x19360e0bn6b85774078a15c99@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:52, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Greg Smith<gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
>> I got bit by this tonight as part of testing a patch on CentOS 5, which like
>> RHEL 5 still ships flex 2.5.4.  I just wrote a little guide on how to grab a
>> source RPM from a Fedora version and install it to work around that problem:
>> http://notemagnet.blogspot.com/2009/07/upgrading-flex-from-source-rpm-to.html
>>
>> Kind of annoying, but as special software you have to install on a server
>> just to build something from CVS goes it's only a minor inconvenience.
>
> *sigh*. So does OS X Tiger. And (unsurprisingly), CentOS 4, which is
> what we use for all our Linux build servers.
>
> This is getting quite tiresome :-(
Much as I dislike it, we may need to revisit the idea about putting
the flex output files in CVS...
-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Self: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-07-23 09:11:20 | Re: Extension Facility | 
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-07-23 08:52:03 | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |