| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors |
| Date: | 2007-02-27 02:46:59 |
| Message-ID: | 9820.1172544419@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-students |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Correct me if I am wrong, but would the way that HOT has been handled be
> a good way for the SoC people to do things?
Well, the HOT discussion hasn't yet led to an accepted patch ... and I'd
say its authors still did way too much work before getting the community
involved. But certainly it's a better model to look at than what the
FD author did.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-02-27 02:47:32 | Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-02-27 02:44:34 | Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-02-27 04:43:46 | Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-27 02:25:51 | Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors |