Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?

From: dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, tih+mail(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Date: 1998-06-16 08:20:36
Message-ID: 9806160820.AA10369@hawk.illustra.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > >> PPC/Linux has been broken too.
> > >
> > >Please let me know what the problem was, even if it was just the 'global tas'
> > >thing. I am trying to make sure this works on all platforms. Thanks.
> >
> > Here are patches for s_lock.c (against May23 snapshot).
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > *** s_lock.c.orig Mon May 25 18:08:20 1998
> > --- s_lock.c Mon May 25 18:08:57 1998
> > ***************
> > *** 151,161 ****
> >
> > #if defined(PPC)
> >
> > ! static int
> > ! tas_dummy()
> > {
> > __asm__(" \n\
> > - tas: \n\
> > lwarx 5,0,3 \n\
> > cmpwi 5,0 \n\
> > bne fail \n\
> > --- 151,160 ----
> >
> > #if defined(PPC)
> >
> > ! int
> > ! tas(slock_t *lock)
> > {
> > __asm__(" \n\
> > lwarx 5,0,3 \n\
> > cmpwi 5,0 \n\
> > bne fail \n\
>
> This patch appears to have been applied already.
>
> --

Yes. I picked up all the S_LOCK related patches and messages from the
mailinglist and folded them into the big S_LOCK patch that just got commited.
So, unless I have messed up, or someone comes up with something new, no
other S_LOCK patches should be applied.

Thanks

-dg

David Gould dg(at)illustra(dot)com 510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468
Informix Software 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612
- A child of five could understand this! Fetch me a child of five.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jose' Soares Da Silva 1998-06-16 11:00:05 Re: [HACKERS] User authentification failed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-06-16 07:53:39 Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?