Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST
Date: 2011-12-14 16:36:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Right at the moment, my local copy has completely broken handling of
> WAL, because I've been focusing on the opclass interface and didn't
> worry about WAL while I was whacking the picksplit code around.
> I'll try to clean that up today and then post a new version of the
> patch.

I promised a patch, so here is what I've got now.  At this point I've
been through most of the code at least once.  I'm fairly happy with the
opclass interface details, and have brought the documentation for that
to what seems a committable state.  I have a lot of other loose ends
still to look at, but I think the major commit blocker at this point is
the VACUUM code, which I don't like/trust at all.  I'll comment on that
more in a separate message.

			regards, tom lane

Attachment: spgist-20111214.patch.gz
Description: application/octet-stream (69.3 KB)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-12-14 17:03:06
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2011-12-14 16:36:21
Subject: Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group