Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
Date: 2008-01-31 17:01:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> PQinitSSL *is* documented, though looking at the para immediately raises
>> the question what the heck we are doing pointing to a random page
>> for SSL documentation.

> I added that for 8.3.  The HP documentation seemed excellent, which is
> why I added it.

The question is not about whether that doc is good, bad, or indifferent;
it is about the likely lifespan of the URL.  A URL containing mostly
random numbers instead of words does not fill me with confidence.
Furthermore HP is hardly the authoritative reference on SSL.  Can't
we find an RFC or something?

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-01-31 17:14:54
Subject: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2008-01-31 16:53:02
Subject: Re: Supported platforms list

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group