Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel
Date: 2002-09-26 04:02:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Joe Conway wrote:
>> I can't think of a reason to have sub-second values, but it's
>> probably not worth changing it at this point.

> Most queries are sub-second in duration so it seemed logical to keep it
> the same as deadlock_timeout.

And machines get faster all the time.

I'm not too concerned about resolution of a connection timeout, but
I think we want to be able to express small query timeouts.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-26 04:02:49
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-09-26 04:00:10
Subject: Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group