Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive
Date: 2010-02-18 11:55:02
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> 2010/2/17 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> The server status patch for previous release had quite some changes, so
>>> I'm not sure that four timers are still essential. Anyways, we can still
>>> have four different timers and only one refresh rate.
>>> Dave, do you remember why you think four timers are essential?
>> Because refreshing some panes is much more expensive than others. If
>> you can come up with a better UI design, feel free, but I don't want
>> to lose the ability to have different refresh rates for each pane.
> Do we actually need different ones for each pane though, or do we just
> need one for the log and one for the rest? (That might open up more
> options for how to make such an UI..)

Thats a possibility.

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: pgAdmin TracDate: 2010-02-18 20:58:15
Subject: [pgAdmin III] #141: Provide a way to reload conf
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-02-18 11:27:29
Subject: Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group