| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marek Černocký <marek(at)manet(dot)cz> |
| Subject: | Re: Second l10n patch |
| Date: | 2009-08-03 11:04:34 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10908030404q2e67e375ycc9ad3415e440ebf@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
2009/8/3 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>:
> Le lundi 3 août 2009 à 12:33:56, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Le lundi 3 août 2009 à 11:57:02, Dave Page a écrit :
>> > 2009/8/1 Marek Černocký <marek(at)manet(dot)cz>:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I send patch. It solves translation for object type names in reports.
>> >
>> > Should code like this use wxPLURAL?
>> >
>> > int section = report->XmlCreateSection(wxString::Format(_("%s
>> > dependents"), object->GetTranslatedTypeName().c_str()));
>>
>> No. We need wxPLURAL when we have a variable that tells us if it is plural
>> or not. In this code, there's nothing that gives us a hint about it.
>>
>> Note that I didn't actually try this patch. Only read it.
>
> Just tried it, and it works the way I think it should. I can commit it if you
> want.
Sure - thanks.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-08-03 11:10:17 | Re: Change: l10n patch |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-08-03 11:03:39 | Re: Second l10n patch |