Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Sourceforge PG release

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release
Date: 2009-07-06 13:38:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Fwiw, i think having an project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
>> > confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
>> > actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
>> > anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
>> >
>> yeah! i was wondering about the very same thing... what's the
>> usefulness for maintaining a project?
> I don't know, but as long as it exists we should keep it current.  Do we
> want to remove it?

I think we should.

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2009-07-06 13:52:14
Subject: Re:
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-07-06 13:09:07
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group