On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> So the rest of us have to start filtering junk from our -www
>>> subscription? Please undo this.
>> Unless you have a better way of ensuring everything gets moderated.
>> This was discussed last week,
> Discussed where? Not here, that I saw.
Thread starts here:
> Personally, I'm perfectly capable of procmail'ing these things into
> oblivion, and I'm sure most of the other subscribers to -www are too.
> So in a week or so the only effect that these missives will have is
> to permanently clutter the list archives.
Well frankly this is exactly the sort of thing this list was
originally setup for, alongside discussion and other admin issues. I
was quite happy to leave it as a closed list, but others wanted it
opened up so they could see what went on.
> (If you wanted actual shame, how about a report saying "so-and-so
> hasn't done any moderation work in X weeks"?)
Not very practical, as the system doesn't know anything about the
moderators, and some only cover areas that rarely need any work, or
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2009-06-16 19:37:39|
|Subject: Re: List moderation - need a break!|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-06-16 15:04:25|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16 |