Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break!

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, sysadmins <sysadmins(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break!
Date: 2009-06-16 14:42:08
Message-ID: 937d27e10906160742u1635c48le83465e251552c3b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Marc G. Fournier<scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes - that was what I thought everyone agreed. Otherwise, I just end
>> up having to approve potentially dozens of messages if a thread
>> crosses over from somewhere else.
>
> Done:
>
> configset pgsql-www restrict_post <<ENDAAB
> GLOBAL:
> ENDAAB

I just realised you only did that for -www. The idea was to do it for
all the lists. For example, I just had to deal with this:

> The following request:
>
> "(post to webmaster)"
>
> was sent to postgresql.org
> by Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>.
>
> The request requires your confirmation for the following reason(s):
>
> The author (Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>)
> is not a member of any of the restrict_post groups.

Thanks!

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-16 14:42:47 Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-06-16 14:39:07 Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16