| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32 |
| Date: | 2009-05-15 14:44:32 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10905150744q56115c46ga97a6515339cfb2a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ho, that's pretty curious. The first two messages are the trace of the
> atexit hook I recently installed, which means something called exit()
> or the moral equivalent thereof. I wouldn't really expect that to
> happen in a crash situation ... is Windows dumb enough to try to run
> the atexit hooks of a crashed process?
Hmm, the MSDN docs don't say whether or not it will. A quick test,
forcing a crash by writing beyond the end of a char array shows that
it does follow spec and doesn't call the hooks.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-15 14:47:38 | Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32 |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-05-15 14:42:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file |