Re: 9.0 ?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Chander Ganesan" <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info
Subject: Re: 9.0 ?
Date: 2009-01-06 19:45:31
Message-ID: 937d27e10901061145u968c105x61744d7c844f4f78@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> With some bemusement I notice your posts on this topic whenever "PostgreSQL
> 10" is mentioned anywhere. But it is quite frankly complete nonsense. Any
> packaging system worth anything can handle that without any problem.

Even Windows will cope with it :-p

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

  • Re: 9.0 ? at 2009-01-06 19:30:53 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-01-07 06:00:53 Re: 9.0 ?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-01-06 19:30:53 Re: 9.0 ?