Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
Subject: Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Date: 2008-11-25 08:31:02
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
> We actually have such a database on pgfoundry already
> (, which i think
> devrim may have packaged into an rpm; it wouldn't hurt to add it to the win32
> installer, but would you feel better if it were a contrib module or
> something?

I'm in favour of including it by default (at initdb), so it's there
for new users to play with on any fresh install - however, there is
only a point to that if all the documentation examples are based on
that database to allow copy-paste-play.

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2008-11-25 08:34:36
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2008-11-25 06:54:21
Subject: Re: How should pg_standby get over the gap of timeline?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group