Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgScript patch

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Mickael Deloison" <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgScript patch
Date: 2008-08-12 14:47:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> Ok, bad example. But I think you misunderstood the part about
> "isolation", if that's what you mean with the part about separate.
> I mean, the vast majority of pgscript will not overlap with th vast
> majority of pgadmin code. Thus, someone who's "just working on the
> object tree" for example, will not be affected at all by integrating
> pgscript.
> Whereas we should of course integrate them at all points where it's
> reasonable, because that is likely to give a much better user experience.

What you advocate there sounds to me like it should be integrated in
the sense that it's part of our codebase, but isolated in it's own
project and built as a DLL to be used by pgAdmin. Which in some ways
gives us the best of both worlds, as Mickael could continue to
maintain the code outside of the pgAdmin cycle, either directly on
branches of the pgAdmin code, or by working on a copy from which we
update the pgAdmin tree periodically.

I actually kinda like that idea...

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:

In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Mickael DeloisonDate: 2008-08-12 15:01:58
Subject: Re: pgScript patch
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-08-12 14:39:35
Subject: Re: pgScript patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group