| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Douglas McNaught" <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 16:00:55 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10805290900t216a1a77wd33f78f1bba53fd5@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> The only question I have is... what does this give us that PITR doesn't
>> give us?
>
> I think the idea is that WAL records would be shipped (possibly via
> socket) and applied as they're generated, rather than on a
> file-by-file basis. At least that's what "real-time" implies to me...
Yes, we're talking real-time streaming (synchronous) log shipping.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mathias Brossard | 2008-05-29 16:01:44 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-29 15:58:31 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mathias Brossard | 2008-05-29 16:01:44 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-29 15:58:31 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |