Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch queue -> wiki (was varadic patch)

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch queue -> wiki (was varadic patch)
Date: 2008-04-03 08:12:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>  It is not clear to me how a wiki can be easily created for 2k emails and
>  then maintained in a reasonable way, or how emails can be added to it
>  easily.

That seems like a *really* odd thing for one of the founders of the
world's most advanced OSS DBMS project to say. It's all relational
(which we do do pretty well) - we can add links to the wiki to threads
in the archives, and anything posted from then on is self-maintaining
(except when new threads are started - but even if each patch gets 5
threads that's not a huge chore).

I see no reason to go manually copying all 2k emails to the wiki.

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd:
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference:

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: damien clochardDate: 2008-04-03 08:31:12
Subject: New planet discovered !
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-04-03 00:08:01
Subject: Re: Advertizing email footers

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom DunstanDate: 2008-04-03 09:11:29
Subject: Re: modules
Previous:From: Dawid KuroczkoDate: 2008-04-03 07:23:06
Subject: psql \G command -- send query and output using extended format

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group