| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch queue -> wiki (was varadic patch) |
| Date: | 2008-04-03 08:12:32 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10804030112i3b0c0ec4l392e54b0b375dd20@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> It is not clear to me how a wiki can be easily created for 2k emails and
> then maintained in a reasonable way, or how emails can be added to it
> easily.
That seems like a *really* odd thing for one of the founders of the
world's most advanced OSS DBMS project to say. It's all relational
(which we do do pretty well) - we can add links to the wiki to threads
in the archives, and anything posted from then on is self-maintaining
(except when new threads are started - but even if each patch gets 5
threads that's not a huge chore).
I see no reason to go manually copying all 2k emails to the wiki.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Dunstan | 2008-04-03 09:11:29 | Re: modules |
| Previous Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2008-04-03 07:23:06 | psql \G command -- send query and output using extended format |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | damien clochard | 2008-04-03 08:31:12 | New planet discovered ! |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-03 00:08:01 | Re: Advertizing email footers |