From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <andreas(at)scherbaum(dot)biz>, "Susanne Ebrecht" <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: namespace issues ... |
Date: | 2008-03-22 21:31:48 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10803221431s7bb7d260t6c8091025c4cf6f2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgeu-general |
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Is pgeu-general on the archives, or excluded? is it just teh -board
> list that is excluded?
Just -board. -general is public.
> Basically, what I'd propose is:
>
> shutdown mail server during name change
> mv (and make a copy of) pgeu-general to pgeu-general (at the file
> system level)
> regenerate alias/virtual table
> edit config file and mboxes and change all occurances of pgeu-general
> to pgeu-general
> add pgeu-general to exclusion list
> restart mail server
>
> the backup of the original files would be in case I'm wrong about how
> majordomo regenerates its aliases file ... I believe its straight from teh
> file system, but a backup would ensure that I could put it back
> quick/easily if I'm wrong ...
>
> If that sounds good to you, I'll do it late tonight and send a note out
> once completed, which will act as a test at teh same time ...
>
Sounds OK to me. Anyone else see any showstoppers?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-03-22 21:46:37 | Re: namespace issues ... |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-03-22 21:28:58 | Re: namespace issues ... |