| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <andreas(at)scherbaum(dot)biz>, "Susanne Ebrecht" <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: namespace issues ... |
| Date: | 2008-03-22 21:10:13 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10803221410o795f6109wd3ebfe8ef1641f4b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgeu-general |
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
> > Marc, what is the status of this change?
>
> I'm afraid? :)
Good answer :-)
> Actually, most of this is simple ... my 'fear' is the archives ... I can
> easily rename the archive files themselves, its the messages themselves
> that are a bit difficult ... do I leave those archives 'as is', or should
> I do a mass search-n-replace of 'pgeu-general' -> pgeu-general' inside
> of them so that all the To/From addresses get changed?
>
> Opinions on this?
You'd do the mboxes I assume, and then regenerate the archives? That
should work I guess, as long as no incoming mail hits an mbox whilst
you're rewriting it.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-22 21:27:49 | Re: namespace issues ... |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-03-22 20:56:35 | Re: namespace issues ... |