Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: namespace issues ...

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <andreas(at)scherbaum(dot)biz>, "Susanne Ebrecht" <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: namespace issues ...
Date: 2008-03-22 21:10:13
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgeu-general
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>  > Marc, what is the status of this change?
>  I'm afraid? :)

Good answer :-)

>  Actually, most of this is simple ... my 'fear' is the archives ... I can
>  easily rename the archive files themselves, its the messages themselves
>  that are a bit difficult ... do I leave those archives 'as is', or should
>  I do a mass search-n-replace of 'pgeu-general' -> pgeu-general' inside
>  of them so that all the To/From addresses get changed?
>  Opinions on this?

You'd do the mboxes I assume, and then regenerate the archives? That
should work I guess, as long as no incoming mail hits an mbox whilst
you're rewriting it.

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd:
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference:

In response to


pgeu-general by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-03-22 21:27:49
Subject: Re: namespace issues ...
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2008-03-22 20:56:35
Subject: Re: namespace issues ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group