Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bouncing replies

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql(at)ultimeth(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bouncing replies
Date: 2008-02-11 08:54:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-sql
On Feb 11, 2008 5:06 AM, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)
<postgresql(at)ultimeth(dot)com> wrote:
> If mail to my list address doesn't come from one of your list
> servers (and those seems to change much more often than any other list I
> belong to), it gets rejected.

Those must be some *really* long-lived lists. Our mailserver has been for probably 7 or 8 years now. Many moons ago we
did use some additional relay servers, but I don't think we've done
that for 5+ years.

> I'm curious as to why the list server defaults to using a sender's
> address as the "Reply-to" address, rather than using the list address.
> That means that, unless the user is careful to "reply all" (or even
> better, just reply to the list address), any discussion immediately goes
> private.

Because thats the convention on these lists that people are used to
and prefer in general.

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:
The Oracle-compatible database company

In response to

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)Date: 2008-02-11 09:30:50
Subject: Re: Bouncing replies
Previous:From: Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)Date: 2008-02-11 05:06:37
Subject: Re: Bouncing replies

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group