Re: Slony schemas

On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> >> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>> I would like to move slony schemas under the Catalogs node instead of
> >>> the Schema node, since you're not meant to store "normal stuff" under
> >>> there.
> >>>
> >>> Any objections to this?
> >> Actually, let me rephrase that. Any objections *or approvals* of that? ;-)
> >
> > Sounds sensible to me. They should probably have a sensible artificial
> > name (like the catalogs do) so it's obvious what they are.
>
> Right now I have (for schema _cluster1): "Slony catalog (cluster1)".
> Seems sensible enough?

Yup.

/D