Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Slony schemas

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slony schemas
Date: 2008-01-14 21:23:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> >> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>> I would like to move slony schemas under the Catalogs node instead of
> >>> the Schema node, since you're not meant to store "normal stuff" under
> >>> there.
> >>>
> >>> Any objections to this?
> >> Actually, let me rephrase that. Any objections *or approvals* of that? ;-)
> >
> > Sounds sensible to me. They should probably have a sensible artificial
> > name (like the catalogs do) so it's obvious what they are.
> Right now I have (for schema _cluster1): "Slony catalog (cluster1)".
> Seems sensible enough?



In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2008-01-14 22:14:07
Subject: Re: Slony schemas
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-01-14 21:08:11
Subject: Re: Slony schemas

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group