Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Slony schemas

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slony schemas
Date: 2008-01-14 20:46:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I would like to move slony schemas under the Catalogs node instead of
> > the Schema node, since you're not meant to store "normal stuff" under
> > there.
> >
> > Any objections to this?
> Actually, let me rephrase that. Any objections *or approvals* of that? ;-)

Sounds sensible to me. They should probably have a sensible artificial
name (like the catalogs do) so it's obvious what they are.


In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-01-14 21:08:11
Subject: Re: Slony schemas
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-01-14 18:32:29
Subject: Re: Slony schemas

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group