| From: | Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Karl Schnaitter <karlsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables |
| Date: | 2010-03-02 09:04:10 |
| Message-ID: | 9362e74e1003020104q14a4b3fayb7c4ae5ca8bdc510@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>
> I think you have to take up a simpler project as a first project. This
> is a major overhaul of transaction information and it depends on
> understanding how a lot of different areas work -- all of which are
> very complex tricky areas to understand.
>
>
>
Greg,
I just feel the fast full index scan may not be of much value, if
we have to go to the table for visibility information. I think the feature
needs the visibility map to get completed. Please let me know, if you feel
otherwise.
Thanks,
Gokul.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-02 09:48:28 | Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2010-03-02 08:18:48 | WAL replay does not verify integrity |