Re: Doc tweak for huge_pages?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc tweak for huge_pages?
Date: 2018-01-25 16:16:27
Message-ID: 92b8b0db-26ce-ba93-e0ce-9495d56dfb72@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/22/18 01:10, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Sorry, right, that was 100% wrong. It would probably be correct to
> remove the "not", but let's just remove that bit. New version
> attached.

Committed that.

I reordered some of the existing material because it seemed to have
gotten a bit out of order with repeated patching.

I also softened the advice against THP just a bit, since that is
apparently still changing all the time.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-01-25 16:29:34 Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Refuse setting toast.* reloptions when TOAST table does not exist
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2018-01-25 16:12:31 Re: unique indexes on partitioned tables