| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new |
| Date: | 2008-12-01 17:18:41 |
| Message-ID: | 92EED756-A454-4AD6-B7D0-80FE358388AC@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 1 dec 2008, at 18.10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I could assign it to a variable, but won't the compiler just optimize
>> that away?
>
> Wouldn't count on that, particularly not if you are modifying other
> strings at the same time.
>
I'm not modifying them. But - point taken, will change.
Another q: given that we no longer need fnmatch(), should we remove it
from port, or leave it around in case we need it in the future? (it's
not like we can't get it back if we need it, but...)
/Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-01 17:28:32 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-12-01 17:11:18 | pgsql: Modify the new to_timestamp implementation so that |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-01 17:22:45 | Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-01 17:10:15 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new |