Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 18:12, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> An obvious fix would be to call set_max_safe_fds() in the child processes,
>> although I wonder if that's too expensive. Another option is to pass down
>> the value with save_restore_backend_variables().
> ISTM that passing down through save_restore_backend_variables() is a
> much better choice.
+1. Having multiple children running set_max_safe_fds() concurrently
would be a seriously bad idea.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-03-29 02:12:05|
|Subject: Re: pgxs and bison, flex |
|Previous:||From: Joachim Wieland||Date: 2012-03-29 01:54:53|
|Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump|