| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: extensible planner state |
| Date: | 2025-09-28 15:41:41 |
| Message-ID: | 91939.1759074101@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Done now. Here's a rebase of the rest, plus I tweaked the GEQO patch
> to try to avoid a compiler warning that cfbot was complaining about.
I'm good with the v7 patch set, except for the complaint I raised
previously that we really ought to have more than zero documentation
for planner()'s parameters. If you don't care to write such text,
attached is a cut at it.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-document-planner-arguments.patch | text/x-diff | 1.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-09-28 16:54:23 | Re: allow benign typedef redefinitions (C11) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-09-28 14:35:19 | Re: allow benign typedef redefinitions (C11) |