> This is going to be dominated by constraint exclusion checking. There's
> basically no fix for that except a more explicit representation of the
> partitioning rules.
Damn, I knew that was going to be more complicated :)
So in which case does this patch help? I guess in a multi-index
scenario? childtables.sql is kind of hard to read (I think a FOR loop
would have been more auto-explaining?).
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-10-29 15:54:52|
|Subject: Re: crash in plancache with subtransactions |
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-10-29 15:40:47|
|Subject: Re: crash in plancache with subtransactions|