Re: Patch to include PAM support...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Date: 2001-06-12 16:32:12
Message-ID: 9043.992363532@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is there any interest in PAM support? If not, I will reject this patch.

We have seen multiple requests for PAM support, so there's interest out
there. But IIRC, I had some serious concerns about this proposed
implementation.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Roberts 2001-06-12 16:33:51 lo_copy routine
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-12 16:28:44 Improving pg_hba.conf

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-12 16:35:10 Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-12 16:27:44 Re: Patch to include PAM support...