From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: small psql patch - show Schema name for \dt \dv \dS |
Date: | 2002-07-20 14:14:16 |
Message-ID: | 901.1027174456@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> It sorts on "Schema" first, and "Name" second.
> Sample output:
> List of relations
> Name | Schema | Type | Owner
> --------------------+------------+------+----------
> __testpassbyval | public | view | postgres
> fooview | public | view | postgres
> master_pg_proc | public | view | postgres
> rmt_pg_proc | public | view | postgres
> vw_dblink_get_pkey | public | view | postgres
> vw_dblink_replace | public | view | postgres
> ts_view | testschema | view | postgres
It seems rather odd and confusing that the sort order takes the second
column as the major key. I think that the sort ordering should be
column 1 then 2. That means either putting the schema column first,
or keeping this column ordering and sorting on relname before schema.
I lean towards the first choice but can see a case for the second.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-20 14:27:48 | Re: show() function - updated patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-20 13:47:13 | Re: small psql patch - show Schema name for \dt \dv \dS |