| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Just as an FYI We are up solid now on pgsql libpq version |
| Date: | 2005-10-05 17:55:14 |
| Message-ID: | 900.1128534914@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joel Fradkin
>> We have been up solid. I built the version we are using just
>> prior to your separating aschii and non aschii (so it's the non aschii
>> version).
> Excellent news - hopefully you boss is somewhat happier now as well :-)
> It might be worth trying the very latest CVS code with your DTS packages
> - there's at least one fix in there specifically for a SQL Server
> problem, plus the ANSI build of the driver is much more akin to the 7,4
> series.
Seems like it's about time to consider sticking the new version into
Fedora. I can't use a CVS pull for that, though; I have to have a
traceable tarball. Are you planning to make a release soon?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-10-05 18:53:16 | Re: Just as an FYI We are up solid now on pgsql libpq version |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-05 17:50:03 | Insecurity of ODBC debug logging files |