Re: [PATCH] Add pretty-printed XML output option

From: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pretty-printed XML output option
Date: 2023-02-15 12:31:43
Message-ID: 8f593e67-d8cd-7015-262d-d7b45e53230d@uni-muenster.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15.02.23 12:11, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Well, I don't see why we would depart from what we've been doing in the
> rest of the XML tests. I did see that patch and I thought it was taking
> the wrong approach.

Fair point.

v10 patches the xml.out to xml_2.out - manually removing the additional
lines.

Thanks for the review!

Best, Jim

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0001-Add-pretty-printed-XML-output-option.patch text/x-patch 28.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2023-02-15 12:32:11 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2023-02-15 11:53:00 Re: Refactoring postgres_fdw/connection.c