| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints |
| Date: | 2009-07-27 20:54:39 |
| Message-ID: | 8e2dbb700907271354q4c84b2aem79c079f9e0c1bf10@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/7/27 Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we did add another column to pg_trigger, I'd be a bit tempted to add
>> one to pg_constraint too. tgconstrrelid for RI triggers is a mirror of
>> a pg_constraint column, and it seems like the index data perhaps should
>> be as well. (Indeed, one of the thing that got me annoyed about this
>> kluge in the first place was that it broke that relationship without
>> changing the documentation.)
>
> That would work great for me, as I was planning to add such a column
> anyway for my "generalized index constraints" patch.
>
Yes that seems like the most sensible option to me.
- Dean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-07-27 20:55:49 | Re: SRPMs? |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-07-27 20:45:15 | Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints |