On Sep 28, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> On 09/28/2010 07:24 AM, Li Jie wrote:
>> I'm interested in this parallel project,
>> But I can't find any discussion and current progress in the website, it
>> seems to stop for nearly a year?
> Yeah, I don't know of anybody really working on it ATM.
> If you are interested in a process based design, please have a look at
> the bgworker infrastructure stuff. It could be of help for a
> process-based implementation.
> Markus Wanner
yes, i don't know of anybody either.
in addition to that it is more than a giant task. it means working on more than just one isolated part.
practically i cannot think of any stage of query execution which would not need some changes.
i don't see a feature like that within a realistic timeframe.
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2010-09-28 11:46:00|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-09-28 10:18:13|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement|