> > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
> Nope. It has been broken a long time...
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-09-27 00:06:37|
|Subject: Re: use of / in ~ vs. ~* |
|Previous:||From: Mikheev, Vadim||Date: 2000-09-26 22:06:48|
|Subject: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?|